Anyone notice some ad formats work better in iGaming ads?
-
I’ve been running iGaming advertising campaigns for a while now, and honestly, I never realized how much the ad format itself could make or break performance. I always thought creative and targeting were the main factors. Turns out, the actual format — whether it’s push, native, banner, or interstitial — can completely change how users react.
It hit me one day when I was comparing two campaigns promoting the same casino offer. One was using standard banner ads, the other used native placements on gaming-related blogs. Same targeting, same ad copy — but the native version crushed it. The CTR was nearly double, and the bounce rate was way lower. That’s when I started digging into how formats really affect ROI in iGaming advertising.
When I Realized Format Isn’t Just a “Creative Choice”
At first, I mostly ran banners and push notifications. Push ads looked great on paper — cheap traffic, wide reach, and immediate visibility. But they had a catch: tons of accidental clicks. People were curious enough to tap, but not committed enough to deposit or sign up. The CTR looked impressive, but conversions told a different story.
Then I experimented with in-page pushes and native ads. The difference was almost instant. In-page pushes performed more “authentically” — they blended into content and didn’t trigger that “I’m being advertised to” feeling. Native ads took it even further. When placed within sports or betting articles, they looked like genuine recommendations rather than flashy promotions.
Suddenly, the traffic felt real. People were clicking because they were interested, not just curious. That was the first time I realized that iGaming advertising isn’t only about flashy visuals or high CTR — it’s about using formats that match the audience mindset.
What Didn’t Work (And What I Stopped Using)
I’ll admit, I jumped on pop-under ads for a while because older affiliates swore they were gold. But these days, they’re more trouble than they’re worth. Ad blockers kill most impressions, and users who do see them often close them immediately. Even when I managed a few conversions, the ROI just didn’t justify the spend.
Video ads were another hit-or-miss story. They looked amazing for slot apps and casino intros, but production costs and inconsistent traffic quality made it hard to scale. You need solid creatives and an audience that actually watches the video — not skips it after three seconds. For smaller or mid-level budgets, video formats feel like overkill.
The Small Adjustments That Paid Off
What helped me most was pairing the right ad format with the right part of the funnel. For cold audiences who’d never heard of the brand, native and in-page push ads worked beautifully. They built curiosity without being intrusive.
Once users had interacted or clicked through once, I switched to interstitials and banners for retargeting — stronger CTAs, more urgency. That combo boosted my ROI noticeably, even when CTR stayed steady.
Another thing that made a big difference? Adjusting landing pages for each ad format. Push ads led to better results when the landing page had short, punchy copy. Native ads worked best with more editorial-style landers that looked like blog posts or expert reviews.
Also, I toned down my creatives. I used to flood banners with flashing coins, dice, and “WIN NOW!” text. But when I simplified the visuals — focusing on clean layouts and subtle imagery — engagement actually improved. Seems people are getting tired of overly loud gambling visuals.
A Post That Helped Me Understand This Better
During one of my late-night research sprees, I found a pretty useful breakdown on which ad formats deliver the best CTR and ROI for iGaming. It helped me confirm some of the things I was already seeing in my own campaigns — especially how native and in-page pushes tend to outperform when done right. You can check it out here if you want: best ad formats for iGaming CTR.
It’s not a “magic formula” kind of read, but it gives a practical overview of which formats fit certain goals — awareness, conversion, retention, etc.
Final Takeaways
If there’s one thing I’ve learned about iGaming advertising, it’s that there’s no single “best” ad format. It all depends on where your audience is in the funnel, the creative tone, and how the ad fits into the platform’s environment.
Here’s what’s been working for me lately:
-
Push ads: Great for awareness but watch for click quality.
-
Native ads: Best for trust and engagement.
-
Interstitials: Work well in retargeting and mobile environments.
-
Banners: Still useful, but only with good placement and timing.
And no matter what format you use, test constantly. A format that works great on one traffic source can flop on another. I’ve learned that it’s not about chasing trends — it’s about matching your format to how your audience prefers to engage.
Anyway, that’s been my experience so far. Curious if anyone else has noticed the same pattern with ad formats in iGaming? Especially for newer platforms — are in-page pushes still performing well for you guys?
-