What ad formats work best for insurance business advertising?
-
I’ve been seeing a lot of posts lately asking why insurance ads don’t seem to get the same response as other finance offers. Honestly, I’ve wondered the same thing. You set up an ad, put in a decent budget, and still the leads feel weak or just not serious. It makes you stop and think if the issue is really the offer or if it’s the way the ad is being shown.
When I first got into insurance business advertising, I assumed ads were ads. If something worked for loans or credit cards, it should work for insurance too, right? Turns out, not really. Insurance feels more personal. People don’t wake up excited to buy a policy. Most of the time, they only care when something pushes them to think about risk or future problems.
The biggest pain point I had was wasting money on formats that looked good but didn’t convert. Banner ads with strong slogans got impressions but barely any clicks. Text ads brought clicks, but most people dropped off right away. It felt like I was either getting attention with no intent or intent with no trust.
So I started paying attention to how people actually react to insurance ads when they’re just browsing online. From what I’ve seen, display ads can work, but only if they’re super clear and simple. Insurance display ads with too much text or complex visuals just get ignored. What worked better for me were calm visuals and plain messages, something that feels reassuring instead of urgent.
Another thing I noticed is that native-style placements tend to feel more natural. When insurance ads show up in content feeds or between articles, people seem more open to them. It doesn’t feel like they’re being pushed. I’ve personally clicked on ads like that just to read more, not even to buy, but that first step matters a lot in insurance.
Insurance PPC was another mixed experience. Search ads definitely catch people who already have intent, but the competition is rough. Costs go up fast, and if your landing page isn’t strong, it’s money gone. What helped was being very specific. Instead of broad insurance terms, focusing on clear problems or situations made the clicks more meaningful.
Video ads surprised me too. Short videos explaining one simple situation like why coverage matters during travel or health emergencies seemed to connect better than static ads. They don’t need to be fancy. In fact, polished ads sometimes feel less trustworthy than simple, straightforward ones.
What didn’t work for me was pushing too hard. Ads that sounded like sales pitches or promised big benefits instantly just didn’t sit well with insurance audiences. People want to understand first. They want clarity, not pressure. That’s something I learned the slow way.
If I had to sum it up, the formats that worked best were the ones that matched the mindset of insurance buyers. Display ads for awareness, native ads for education, and search ads for people already looking. Mixing them instead of relying on one format made a noticeable difference over time.
At some point, I started reading more about how different finance ad setups handle this balance, especially around insurance business advertising, and that gave me a better idea of how formats fit together instead of competing with each other. Seeing examples and explanations in one place helped me connect the dots without feeling like I was being sold something.
I’m still testing and tweaking things, but now I don’t expect instant results from insurance ads. It’s more about slow trust-building than fast clicks. Once I adjusted my expectations and formats, the results started making more sense.
If you’re struggling with insurance advertising, my honest advice is to stop chasing what works in other niches. Pay attention to how insurance buyers think and choose ad formats that feel supportive, not aggressive. It’s less exciting, but in the long run, it feels way more sustainable.
