What ad formats work best for online insurance ads today?
-
I’ve been seeing a lot of mixed opinions lately about what actually works when it comes to insurance ads online. Some people swear by banners, others say video is the only way now, and a few claim search ads are the safest bet. Honestly, it got me thinking because my own results have been all over the place. What works one month feels dead the next. So I figured I’d share what I’ve noticed and see if it lines up with what others are experiencing.
The biggest challenge I ran into was wasting money on formats that looked good but didn’t really bring the right kind of traffic. Insurance is already a tough space. People don’t wake up excited to click an online insurance ads. Most are either confused, cautious, or just trying to compare options quietly. So when an ad feels pushy or flashy, it usually gets ignored. I made that mistake early on by assuming louder ads meant better results. They didn’t.
I started with simple display banners because they felt like the easiest option. They were cheap, easy to set up, and got a lot of impressions. The problem was the quality. I got clicks, sure, but most people bounced fast. It felt like they clicked out of curiosity, not intent. Over time, I noticed that banner ads only worked when they were super simple and placed on the right kind of sites. If the design was clean and the message felt calm, people stayed longer. Busy banners with too much text just didn’t work for me.
Then I tried native style ads, and this is where things started to feel more natural. These didn’t scream “ad” right away. They blended into the content people were already reading. I noticed users spent more time on the page after clicking. It wasn’t a massive jump in leads, but the quality was better. People seemed more open because they felt like they discovered something rather than being sold to. For insurance, that mindset matters a lot.
Video ads were a mixed bag. Short videos did better than long ones, especially when they focused on a real-life problem instead of features. Anything longer than 15 seconds felt like too much. People just skipped. Also, video worked better for awareness than actual sign-ups. It helped people remember the brand or idea, but rarely led to immediate action. I wouldn’t rely on video alone, but I wouldn’t ignore it either.
Search-style text ads felt the most predictable. If someone is already searching for insurance-related terms, they’re clearly interested. The downside is competition and cost. You really need to watch what keywords you’re using, or you’ll burn through your budget fast. I found that more specific phrases worked better than broad ones. People searching with clear intent were more likely to engage seriously.
One thing I learned the hard way is that no single format works on its own. The ads that performed best were part of a mix. Display helped with visibility, native helped with trust, and search helped catch people who were ready. When I started thinking about ad formats as roles instead of winners, things made more sense.
If you’re still figuring things out, reading different takes helped me a lot. I came across a breakdown on online insurance ads that explained formats in a very grounded way, without overselling anything. It matched closely with what I was seeing in real campaigns, which made it easier to adjust instead of guessing.
Looking back, I’d say the best ad format depends on what stage the user is in. Cold audiences don’t want aggressive ads. Warm audiences don’t want vague ones. Keep it simple, test slowly, and don’t assume trends apply perfectly to insurance. This space needs patience more than hype.
I’m still testing and tweaking, but things feel more stable now than when I chased every new format. Curious to know if others here are seeing similar patterns or if something totally different is working for you.
